![]() ![]() ![]() Through the Scarlett and into my MFX unit which is state art in guitar/vocal FX and can cut itįor a final mix back into Scarlett and into the computer/DAW. I just realized I can take a recorded dry guitar signal from my DAW and send it back isn't hard to imagine doing and I just might. Step with the SA170 Source Audio Prog.EQ. Or the guitar through my MFX unit for FX into the Scarlett, taking it another I have a Scarlett 6i6, I can record through it with a direct guitar input ![]() Routing a 31 Band EQ or a Source Audio SA170 ProgEQ shouldn't be an issue with either into I just got a Source Audio SA170 Programmable EQ and I love this thing The single channel one for $50.00 used and $100.00 new. I have seen these at around $100.00 or less used and $189.00 new As long as its operating with a stable driver, its agnostic as to how the incoming signal was processed.Īre you using the Tripleplay software as host? Would anyone recommend a small, yet good quality, EQ that could fit my requirements? What should I look for? 3-5 or 7-band EQ? Moreover, after all the expenses of the guitar, laptop, synth, and what have you, I certainly don't want to spend too much for a good EQ. I'm fairly new to EQ, so don't know much about that kind of equipment. I guess I will have to go with a hardware EQ to sit between the Focusrite and the speaker. I didn't find anything that works with Focusrite. I tried many types of VSTs and softwares to emulate a virtual Equalizer (EQ) for the output from my laptop Audio Interface (Focusrite - Scarlett 2i2) to my ALTO speakers. The main reason I stopped doing it (1) it's hard to build a good UI to represent the state of your rig the Kemper has bright LEDs everywhere that represent state well (2) it's more vulnerable on stage, and (3) it's just fucking easier to plop down a Stage and be done (a lot easier to transport, to).Quote from: PeterPan8 on December 04, 2017, 10:47:49 AM The main reason I did this is that (1) I love the sound of my PC modeler, Scuffham S-Gear, and (2) I wanted the ability to use my guitar to play synths, (3) I wanted ultimate, fully programmable control over what my foot switches and expression pedals did. This let me write a bunch of custom scripts to control my patch/effect switching, have my wah engage when my pedal moved, stuff like that. I hosted my modeler in Reaper, because it's fast, stable, and programmable. I'd consider something like an Audient EVO: small, bus-powered, low latency drivers. I wonder if buying an amp modeler like Nux mg-30 or Line 6 pod go, which Im seriously considering btw, would make a big difference in the quality of. Ive never really liked the sound of amp sims, to be honest. Given that you're cash strapped, that's not an option. StratsoundFan said: I play my guitars using all sorts of amp sims, exclusively through headphones. I bought a RME Baby Face Pro, so I'd have rock solid driver stability and ultra low latency. This is already a big nest of cables and shit, with a bunch of exposed connections, which just makes the situation more fragile and vulnerable than the Kemper Stage. MIDI chord to interface (if the interface has MIDI IO, otherwise to a USB port on the computer) Interface power supply (unless you get a USB bus powered interface highly recommended) The main difference is that a Kemper Stage is built like a tank, with the computer, interface, power transformer, and footswitches all built into a single metal chassis with a C13 power plug. There's nothing about a live setting vs non-live setting that makes technology behave differently. I have a Kemper Stage (and Kemper Rack, Axe FX, Amplifire, and bunch of other modelers), and have used a PC-based rig live, too. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |